You believe in limiting the legal rights and influence of corporations to promote a more equitable and democratic society.
The Anti-Corporate Personhood political ideology is a perspective that opposes the legal concept of treating corporations as individuals. This ideology argues that corporations should not be granted the same rights and protections as human beings under the law. The concept of corporate personhood has been a contentious issue in legal and political debates for centuries, with its roots tracing back to the early days of capitalism.
The history of the Anti-Corporate Personhood movement is intertwined with the evolution of corporate law. The concept of corporate personhood originated in…
Read more@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
What ways do you think communities could benefit from healthcare decisions without corporate influence?
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
How would you feel if employee-owned businesses were the norm and not the exception?
@9LFL4F2Republican2mos2MO
there needs to be a higher power running the buisiness (manager, boss)
@9LFKY3R2mos2MO
I believe that there should be a balance of “power” in business. The owner decides pay, who works, who works when etc.. The workers abide by these rules, but have the opportunity to petition or go on strike until a deal is worked out.
@9LFKXT92mos2MO
I’d feel more inclined to work, since i know i wont be getting the short end of the stick by big corporations.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
If all companies were required to reinvest profits into the community, what changes might you see in your city or town?
I would add more crosswalks to keep my community safe. Along with more security at crowded places.
@9LCK58WLibertarian 2mos2MO
I would likely see very little; corporations always find a way to usurp responsibility.
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Do you think a corporation should have the same legal rights as a living person, and why or why not?
@9HM8J356mos6MO
no, they are not a living entity they are a money making entity
@9HM8JNKIndependent6mos6MO
No, it gives corporations too much power and influence in society.
@9HM8J526mos6MO
Yes, as these corporations are composed of human beings. Especially those within the United States.
No because corporations are groups of people who already have rights.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
How might your community benefit if local businesses had more power than multinational corporations?
@9HVDXP55mos5MO
It might lead to less money hungry businesses as well as smaller businesses getting more love and appreciation (and money) for making better quality things than mass-produce companies
@9HZJY5J5mos5MO
I feel like no matter where I am in the world I find myself at the same large business. Like Target, Walmart, etc. I feel like people in our community deserve a fighting chance to survive in the market.
@9HVF2MP5mos5MO
I feel like my community could benefit from it because small business owners would thrive and create quality products and culture in my community.
@9HVD6LQWomen’s Equality5mos5MO
Local businesses would have more money and more costumers instead of having Walmart and target and Starbucks take over.
@9HVHPXG5mos5MO
I believe the freedom of choice will be greater, as well as the quality of the services and/or products.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
How do you think personal data and privacy would be handled differently if corporations had fewer rights?
@9HMBKX3Peace and Freedom6mos6MO
I think that corporations should treat their employees as individuals with lives!
@9HMBS3K6mos6MO
It should be handled and seen only when the user is committing felonies or if the police need info of them.
@9HMBCWT6mos6MO
I think people would not take it as serious and care about the topic as much if there were fewer rights.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
How do corporate-sponsored educational programs in schools influence students' perceptions and career choices?
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
In what ways have you seen corporate advertising affect the choices you or your peers make?
@9HMCL3Q 6mos6MO
I've seen my peers talk about a topic, whether that be a social issue or a product, in waves as it is brought to everyone's attention and then immediately goes unnoticed once the advertising for it goes away.
@9HMBW5X6mos6MO
It has effected what my peers think is good for them or effected the quality of something.
@9HM9SPV6mos6MO
They Have made the right choices and not getting into trouble and not do anything bad
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Can you describe a personal experience where a company's customer service either won your loyalty or pushed you away?
@9HVD8K6Progressive5mos5MO
I worked at a food company called Sharkys, they pushed me away by being racist.
@9HVD7L85mos5MO
A company has earned my loyalty by granting me a 50-day guarantee of returns when I didn't like a product or had problems with it.
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
What if your community was in charge of the local water supply instead of a private corporation; how would that change how water is valued?
@9HVFPY9Peace and Freedom5mos5MO
It would change because the local water supply wouldn't allow for
@9HVDFRW5mos5MO
make sure its actually clean ad healthy also the use of less water
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
In an ideal world, how much influence do you think companies should have on our dietary choices and food culture?
@9HTMT3C5mos5MO
They should have a good amount of influence in our choices
@9HTMRBV5mos5MO
In my opinion, the companies should not influence people's choices on dietary choices and food culture because there are people who have religious beliefs that they belief and can't eat. Such as people who are on diet.
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Imagine a world where businesses couldn't donate to political candidates; how do you think this would impact voter power?
@9HVFDK85mos5MO
Less advertisements without sponsors or money given to represent themselves, so everyone would have to vote based off their opinions and not what theyve heard.
@9HVDKKLIndependent5mos5MO
This would make debates less anoying, we can instead focus on real issues instead of "this debate is sponsored by Toyota : Let's Go places"
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
In your opinion, who should be held accountable when harm is caused by a corporate action, and why?
@9HM69HH6mos6MO
The person that caused harm to another should be held accountable for their action because the person who did wrong should be punished so the same thing doesn’t happen again.
@9HM64BN6mos6MO
The executive board should be held liable including any employees involved in the chain of command.
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...