Try the political quiz

11 Replies

 @CheesePiperAnti-Zionismfrom Missouri commented…2wks2W

It's crystal clear that the US has a moral obligation to step in and stop this looming disaster in Rafah. The fact that there's even a debate about whether to prevent an attack that could become "the biggest disaster in the history of the Palestinian people" is beyond frustrating. It's like the international community keeps forgetting that real lives are at stake here, not just political pawns. If the US doesn't use its influence to halt this attack, it'll be another glaring example of how Palestinians' rights and lives are continuously sidelined on the global stage.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2wks2W

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says only U.S. can halt Israel’s attack on Rafah

https://radiohc.cu/en/noticias/internacionales/-palestinian-pres…

Western countries, including Israel’s closest ally and enabler the U.S., have pleaded with it to hold back from attacking the southern city, which abuts the Egyptian border and is sheltering more than one million Palestinians who fled Israel’s seven-month-long assault on much of the rest of Gaza.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2wks2W

Palestinian President Abbas says only US can halt Israel's attack on Rafah, expected in days

https://gulftoday.ae/news/palestinian-president-abbas-says-only…

"What will happen in the coming few days is what Israel will do with attacking Rafah because all the Palestinians from Gaza are gathered there," Abbas said, adding that only a "small strike" on Rafah would force the Palestinian population to flee the Gaza strip.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2wks2W

Only US can halt Israel’s attack on Rafah, says Abbas

https://dawn.com/news/only-us-can-halt-israels-attack-on-rafah-s…

RIYADH : Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said on Sunday only the United States could stop Israel attacking the border city of Rafah in Gaza, adding that the assault, which he expects to come within days, could force much of the Palestinian population to flee the enclave.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2wks2W

Can any country truly be neutral in international conflicts, and should they try to be?

 @9LXQ8W3 from Pennsylvania answered…2wks2W

Countries should remain neutral until it is on the stage of genocide. Then it should be seen as an attack on humanity and hostages and victims of the genocide should be helped and a ceasefire required. Countries can go to war, but don't assassinate civilians just to have a higher body count.

 @9LXPXGT from North Carolina answered…2wks2W

No and no. Being neutral is a sign of cowardice and only thinking of one's own country and not standing up for what's right.

 @9LXN9L6 from Virginia answered…2wks2W

countries need to stop getting involved with issues that don't directly affect them.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2wks2W

What is your personal threshold for justifying military action against civilian areas?

 @9LXLJVK from Virginia answered…2wks2W