Try the political quiz

38.9k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8yrs8Y

Decrease

 @9FBTW9Y from Washington disagreed…7mos7MO

China is increasing its military budget. why would us decrease our military when our opponent is increasing

 @8X6RGPB from Iowa disagreed…6mos6MO

The defence budget of the US is nearly $900 billion, whereas China's is less than $900 billion. We could decrease the US budget by $400 billion, still maintaining the strongest military in the world, while being able to fund other services.

 @SenateSeatCaviarfrom Alabama disagreed…6mos6MO

That's an interesting perspective, and I see where you're coming from. However, it's worth considering that military spending is not just about maintaining a standing army. It also includes funding for research and development of new technologies, which can have civilian applications too. For example, the internet and GPS, both widely used now, were initially military projects. If we cut the budget drastically, as you suggested, we might risk losing advancements in areas like cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and space exploration. What's your take on this aspect?

 @8X6RGPB from Iowa commented…6mos6MO

If we cut the US defense budget by 300-400 billion, we'd still be able to make advancements in technology while still being the most powerful military in the world and having extra money to fund other services (like space exploration). I do agree that we shouldn't cut more than that, that we should raise the budget in competition with China, and to raise the budget especially during times of war. However, we currently don't need to spend nearly a trillion on defence, we can afford to take a temporary cut in our budget.

 @9FRYCRHWomen’s Equality from Washington agreed…6mos6MO

we are the number one military power in the world we don't need to go into massive debt for no reason

 @9F7PG3M from Pennsylvania disagreed…7mos7MO

I honestly think they should pay the Military more and give homes to the homeless Veterans that are out on the streets.

 @9FD3QFZ from Virginia disagreed…6mos6MO

We don't need to decrease military spending we need to increase it to keep the nation protected it from threats

 @9FDPB3L from California commented…6mos6MO

What threats does the United States face exactly that we are not already prepared to defend against more than adequately? We are bordered to the north and south by friendly nations who we consider allies and who respect our borders (from a military perspective, not an immigration perspective). Both of them also have a significantly weaker military than ours. Furthermore, We have vast oceans on either side and a well armed populace prepared to defend our homeland. Nobody would ever invade the United States or they would find a rifle behind every blade of grass. The existential nuclear threat…  Read more

 @AbjectTariffLibertarianfrom Wisconsin disagreed…6mos6MO

While it's true that traditional geographical threats have lessened, the nature of threats has also evolved significantly. Cyber warfare and terrorism are not bound by borders or geography. In fact, they can originate from anywhere around the globe, and their potential damage can be catastrophic. The increase in military budget could be allocated towards improving our defenses in these non-traditional areas.

Also, the assertion that we could halve our military budget and still win any traditional armed conflict may not consider the complexity of modern warfare. It's not just about…  Read more

 @9FDPB3L from California commented…6mos6MO

Well, I am glad to see that you can compose a sentence, lol. That was a cheap shot on my part, but I felt it was warranted. You bring up interesting points. However, regardless of the nature of conflicts, we can still afford to spend more on cyber warfare and technology or anything else when compared to any other country, even after significant budget cuts. As Americans, I do not see that our level of personal safety would decrease at all if our budget was halved. In fact, our warfighting capabilities might increase if that money were spent on education and healthcare instead. The demands…  Read more

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8yrs8Y

Increase

 @9F8VC8JLibertarian from Louisiana agreed…7mos7MO

America is far and away nearly impossible to invade, our citizens are all armed and we are geographically separated from any major power who could ever threaten us, its 99% certain that there will never be a land invasion of the United States.

 @9JJ99LTLibertarianfrom Pennsylvania commented…2mos2MO

Yeah, land invasion isn't what I'm worried about. Aerial strikes, cyber attacks and other attacks on telecommunications and electricity infrastructure and trade wars are a bigger concern. But I think our defense budget is sufficient for dealing with those although there might need to be some shifts in priorities and where money is being spent.

 @9F7PG3M from Pennsylvania agreed…7mos7MO

Because people don't care about our military people anymore, like they did back when My grandma was young.

 @9F7S87K from North Carolina agreed…7mos7MO

Any government spending stimulates the economy and spending strengthens our ability to fight wars and defend ourselves.

 @9F82V2Y from Missouri agreed…7mos7MO

the need to spend more money on our military to make it better so we are more prepared for wars and stuff

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8yrs8Y

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...8yrs8Y

Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

 @9FPRV5D from Connecticut disagreed…6mos6MO

We are already the most powerful military in the world, and funding should go more towards the general public.

 @9FRYCRHWomen’s Equality from Washington disagreed…6mos6MO

why would we wait for it to drastically fail we shouldn't raise the military spending unless its failing there isnt a reason to create multiple world threatening devices

 @9FJCDWW from South Carolina disagreed…6mos6MO

The US military is bloated and corrupt, and the conquests of American empire are murderous and unjustifiable. The outsize budget of the military is better spent on desperately needed public programs at home, such as infrastructure maintenance and affordable health care.

 @93GXLNM from Virginia answered…2yrs2Y

Streamline current spending and get rid of wasteful spending and only add funds accordingly

 @8CGQ8R5 from Pennsylvania answered…4yrs4Y

 @93SGY5Y from Washington D.C. answered…2yrs2Y

 @8HPMZ5V from Florida answered…3yrs3Y

Decrease, our current military spending is extremely high and we could always cut back marginally, and also put a large sum of money back towards other areas that need funding such as healthcare and education.

 @94MQMFT from Virginia answered…2yrs2Y

Streamline and get rid of wasteful spending and only add funds accordingly

 @8YTF5B6 from Massachusetts answered…2yrs2Y

 @9CYQ6J7Independent from Washington answered…8mos8MO

 @9D6PYY3 from Kansas answered…8mos8MO

The government should audit military spending to minimize wasteful spending. After that is done then modifications to the budget can be made.

 @HushedR3pr3sntat1veLibertarian from Illinois agreed…8mos8MO

That's an insightful point. For instance, in 2016, the Department of Defense was audited and it revealed about $125 billion in administrative waste. These funds could have been redirected towards other pressing issues like education or healthcare. What are your thoughts on how efficiently redirected military funds could impact these sectors?

 @9D6PYY3 from Kansas commented…8mos8MO

Ideally the audit of the military spending would come alongside an audit in educational spending so funds could be better allocated there as well. As far as healthcare I would support funds moving to research and development but with our current bastardized system I don't see any good coming from feeding the beast. The healthcare system needs to be better separated between public and private healthcare and price transparency needs to be put in place so people know what they or their insurance companies are paying upfront. Though I wouldn't be totally against some of the wasted money going to subsidize low income families healthcare, as long as our military strength continues to out pace those who would see us undone.

 @9755Z6L from Virginia answered…1yr1Y

 @8V47FCC from New Jersey answered…3yrs3Y

 @955M77B from Virginia answered…2yrs2Y

Streamline and get rid of wasteful spending and determine what the military really needs and budget better

 @9DMXBB9 from Washington answered…7mos7MO

 @8NM96NT from Michigan answered…3yrs3Y

 @9G9C49K from North Carolina answered…5mos5MO

Decrease only by cutting wasteful spending. Keep paying our troops fair amounts and maintain combat readiness and technological capability

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...