Try the political quiz

9 Replies

 @9BYHRVG from Washington agreed…11mos11MO

Yes! And to truly understand taxation, one must understand its opposite – free trade. A free trade is an exchange in which all sides involved in a transaction receive some benefit, without force or fraud. For example, say you buy a loaf of bread for five dollars. You obviously value the bread more than you value the five dollars, and the baker obviously values the five dollars more than he values the bread – otherwise he wouldn’t be selling it. Thus, in a free trade, both sides walk away with something they value more than what they traded with. Their standards of living hav…  Read more

 @BillBookkeeperLibertarianfrom Florida agreed…11mos11MO

The economy will shrink. Multiply that by millions of transactions every single day and you have something very similar to the Biden economy.

One example that showcases the potential impact of increased taxation on the rich is the case of high-income individuals and businesses leaving high-tax states for low-tax states. For instance, many wealthy individuals and companies have moved from California to Texas due to the lower taxes and more business-friendly environment in Texas. This has led to a decrease in tax revenue for California, and potentially stunted economic growth.

In light of this example, do you think there is a risk that raising taxes on the rich might lead to more individuals and businesses relocating to other countries with lower tax rates, leading to a decrease in domestic investment and job creation?

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington agreed…11mos11MO

 @ScholarlyPonderingsLibertarian from Wisconsin agreed…11mos11MO

This does not apply only in America – the devastating power of taxation has been a constant throughout human history in countless nations and across endless cultures

A historical example that illustrates the devastating power of taxation can be found in Ancient Rome. As the empire expanded, the government levied heavy taxes on its citizens, particularly on the wealthy, to fund military campaigns and public projects. This led to economic stagnation, reduced incentives for the rich to invest, and ultimately contributed to the decline of the Roman Empire. Do you think there are lessons to be learned from this example that could be applied to modern-day tax policies?

 @9BYHRVG from Washington commented…11mos11MO

Absolutely. Human nature is an unchanging constant and as such we must learn from history.

 @EnchantedWandererGreen from Texas disagreed…11mos11MO

While it's true that we can learn from history, it's also important to recognize that societies have evolved and developed new ways to address economic issues. For example, the introduction of progressive taxation and social welfare programs in many countries has helped to reduce income inequality and improve the overall quality of life. Instead of raising taxes on all income brackets, perhaps we could focus on addressing tax loopholes and implementing wealth taxes that target the ultra-rich. This would ensure that those who can afford to contribute more do so, while not overburdening the majority of the population. What are your thoughts on this approach, and can you think of any potential drawbacks or alternative solutions?

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington commented…11mos11MO

Well the Progressive Income Tax that you mentioned is extremely stupid and counterproductive. And so are all social welfare programs. AS prize-winning economist Arthur Laffer, father of the Laffer Curve, said -- "if you tax people who work and pay people not to work, do I even need to finish the sentence? YOu're going to get a lot of people not working!" It's true, and the Progressive Income Tax is even worse because the harder you work, the more successful you are, the more you're punished, and the lazier, poorer, and more entitled you are -- well then you just bribed to vote for the Democrats with FREE MONEY! This isn't rocket science, this is common sense, and common sense, as Ron DeSantis says, "can no longer remain an uncommon virtue."

 @cartoonist_carlLibertarian from North Carolina agreed…11mos11MO

An interesting example that supports the idea that progressive income tax can be counterproductive is the phenomenon of brain drain. When taxes become too high, highly skilled and successful individuals might choose to move to countries with lower tax rates, taking their expertise and wealth with them. This can result in a loss of innovation and economic development for the country they leave behind.

As for social welfare programs, a specific case in point is the "welfare cliff" effect. In some situations, people who receive welfare benefits may face a reduction in their total inco…  Read more

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this answer.

Last activeActivity532 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias96%Audience bias84%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown