Try the political quiz

14 Replies

 @L3ftyMariaConstitution from North Carolina commented…10mos10MO

Given that Wales was given Economic Zone One status in the EU, if we were to focus on Wales alone it would probably place even further down that chart.

 @Equ4lRightsJeffRepublican from Texas commented…10mos10MO

In the UK's position, I'd rejoin the EU and go London maximalist.

Anything whose been up norf knows its a derelict wasteland, brain drained for 2 centuries, with no prospects. Makes more sense to double down on the winners.

 @GrudgingLeftLeaningSocialistfrom Pennsylvania commented…10mos10MO

This is a crazy take - economics should be the art of making life better for people, how does continuing with a model which fails the overwhelming majority of the population achieve that?

 @R3gulationArtRepublican from New Hampshire commented…10mos10MO

The UK needs to re-diversify its economy - we need huge state investment in infrastructure and incentives for industry and manufacturing geared at those 'left behind' areas

 @ProportionalMandrillGreen from Mississippi commented…10mos10MO

They should totally abandon “leveling up” and let London evolve into a megalopolis containing 40%+ of the British population. Oxford should be denser than Manhattan

 @QuokkaLillianDemocratfrom New Jersey commented…10mos10MO

Hm I am sure this says something but also indicates why GDP is a poor metric for general wellbeing; if I was truly down and out, I'd still definitely prefer ending up in Saxony Anhalt over Mississipi.

 @L1bertyBradSocialist from Texas agreed…10mos10MO

I wonder what happens if you correct for the annual cost of healthcare needed in US though...

 @QuokkaLillianDemocratfrom New Jersey commented…10mos10MO

Valid point. What if you also correct for cost of housing? Then London (and some US cities) would look much less rich. This all ignores wealth distribution, of course. E.g. being a tenant in London makes you poorer, being a landlord makes you richer.

 @L1bertyBradSocialist from Texas commented…10mos10MO

That’s the drawback of the approach.

But why I mentioned healthcare is that it is a nationwide issue in US and elsewhere.

PPP exchange rates might capture the health costs, but I am not sure hence the suggestion

 @QuokkaLillianDemocratfrom New Jersey commented…10mos10MO

Per capita figures may not tell us enough, when they are averages including extreme poverty and wealth.

We could calculate what it costs to live at various different standards of living in a region, and compare that the the distribution of incomes, to see how well people live.

 @GerrymanderLukeDemocratfrom California commented…10mos10MO

Greater Tokyo is housing 1/3 of all Japanese. Tel Aviv 70% of all Israeli Jews. Without housing regulation London could easily double its population.

Sometimes I wonder if, no housing regulation, people in all countries would just move to one single city.

 @HoopoeDanny from Wisconsin commented…10mos10MO

With massive population decline on the horizon in the G20, population concentration in large cities (or specially in the largest city/capital) is the most likely scenario. Something similar played out in the post-Soviet countries and continues to this day.

 @CheerfulTruffle from Texas commented…10mos10MO

And yet when you travel to San Francisco, the highest scorer on that scale, homeless people are everywhere.

Maybe it doesn't tell the important story. Just where large companies choose to call home and it's little to do with actual personal wealth.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this url.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this url.

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias95%Audience bias75%Active inPartyGreenLocationUnknown