The following is a 3 message exchange between 4 users
@9G2MC2PRepublican 7mos7MO
The most vulnerable of our population (those unborn who cannot speak for themselves) need to be protected. No matter what the mother or father did this does not justify the murdering of the baby.
@Astral.ly 7mos7MO
It's understandable to care about the unborn fetus. Abortion should absolutely be one of the last courses of action. However, in the case that the mother is endangered by the baby, they shouldn't be forced to die because they weren't given access to something that could save a life. They could make another child, and it's much more likely that they will try again considering they already aspired to have a baby. Theirs no guarantee the unborn child will in the future, and the child could be a male incapable of reproducing a child in the way a female can. That, however, is dealing with hypotheticals. In a more straightforward sense, more practical use of just not wanting the child doesn't make sense. You should reap what you sow, but it isn't worth losing a precious mother.
@GloomyRuffsRepublican7mos7MO
Instances where the mother's life is in danger are quite rare.
Moreover, when discussing the potential reproductive capabilities of the unborn child, I believe it's crucial to consider the sanctity of life itself, irrespective of future hypotheticals. Each life has its own inherent value and potential, and it's not our place to decide whose life is worth more based on future possibilities.
With regards to your point about 'reaping what you sow', I would argue that this applies to the unborn child as well. They shouldn't have to pay the ultimate price for circumstances that are beyond their control.
How would you address these concerns, especially the inherent value of each life and the responsibility that comes with creating a new one?
