Again, the capitalist models of the Nordic countries, called Social Democracies, are only temporary band-aid solutions to the problems inherent in capitalism. While they are undeniably better than "more capitalistic" nations with less social safety nets, they still do not address the root cause(s) of the problems in the first place: the private ownership of our economy for personal profits.

And of course all change is subjective, otherwise there would be no disagreement between conservatives and progressives. The issue, as I would argue, is that conservatives tend to reject systems that benefit all people and defend systems that benefit few people, mostly themselves and those like them. The biggest example here being capitalism; conservatives prefer a system in which a private individual can own and control the profits of an entire workplace of people for their own personal gain, and they reject a system in which private individuals cannot exploit others for their own personal gain, whereas progressives are the opposite. What exactly is the positive value being represented by conservatives here?

Lastly, property rights work differently under every system, and capitalism's property rights are exactly what is detrimental to society. Under capitalism, private individuals are able to hold exclusive ownership over our economic means of production. This means that private individuals are able to own and control the profits and production of entire workplaces of people, or the land/homes of other people, or the good and resources that society needs. This is an inherently anti-democratic and anti-societal means of organizing an economy, that only seeks to transfer the wealth and power of others into the hands of a few private interests, while simultaneously excluding access to society's own production from the public.