Try the political quiz

6 Replies

 @9KWR6GZ from Wisconsin answered…3mos3MO

I think minimal interference on the market is best while still have government based safety nets.

 @9KWV22Q from Pennsylvania disagreed…3mos3MO

The government should minimize market interference while insuring that american products are competitive with imported goods.

 @9KWVM5P from Washington disagreed…3mos3MO

without the protections that the government provides then investors will be less likely to invest but businesses are still, in the current market, more inclined to give their dividends to the investors instead of outing the money into R&D and giving the public a better product. I think that the government should be able to force the breakup of monopolies and should implement incentives to re-invest money into R&D or physical capital.

 @9KWRDGQ from New Hampshire answered…3mos3MO

As long as everything is fair there should be no negatives

 @9L399F4 from Kentucky disagreed…2mos2MO

There will always be positives and negatives in a situation but its always better to try and solve those negatives.

 @9KWRN96 from Washington answered…3mos3MO

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...