Ghana Bans All LGBTQ Activities
It does however promote certain aspects of politics to maximize the benefit of the most people, and…
It’s like a congressional caucus in a way, it has a sort of power, but not much, and with its members, laws are upheld in many areas, including the human rights drafted and recognized by the vast majority of nations, courtesy of First Lady Roosevelt. The government serves as an enforcer of rights, and as its biggest members are representative governments, and the majority of the people in those nations agree with the creation of these rights, the people themselves had indirect creation of these rights, thereby admitting that it was not the government, but the people in the government who were elected by the people. The government enforced them because people believe in them, because these human rights were agreed upon by the public after the Second World War.
For homosexuality, it is not established as a right, but agreed upon by many nations of the higher rankings of the UN to be a desirable civil right to be fought for. When using the congressional caucus metaphor, this is a large group of higher-up senators agreeing to the concept of a non enforced international prompting to allow homosexual rights, considering that it’s negative effects are negligible, while it’s restriction leads to violence against those minorities, and the possibility of genocide remains on the periphery for those groups as tensions still rise. Ghana creates worse problems for their gay populations by continually discriminating against these groups, not just because the policy is bad, but because it promotes violence that they will likely ignore knowing their track record with minorities. As acceptance for gay people grows, so too will the probability of considering it’s marriage being considered a right, since rights are created by people, and established by government.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
It is not a government, and it has explicitly stated that it is not a government, but an international peace keeping association that relies upon the voluntary cooperation of independent states to function.
You just said explicitly "rights are created by people and established by government," – you just renounced your right to complain about Ghana's policies. Under the UN Charter, it ha a right to "self-determination" and independence, so you as an American need to but out and mind your own business.
@9CJ6CB63mos3MO
It is a governing body with many non-binding measures, though it is not a GOVERNMENT or a Supra-state in and of itself, the organization does have some legally binding power for its participants, closely mimicking a semi-governmental parliament/congress in the Security Council, though most of it is debate and speaking, large amounts of its purpose and action is about international connections and enforcement of bare minimum rights that can lead to rebuke and sanctions from participant nations.
First of all, the people are not just the nation, they are all the nations, agreed upon and founded… Read more
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
If it's not a government, it can't decide on rights
@9CJ6CB63mos3MO
It’s a parliamentary-style governing body, though not a government, it has some power. It can decide on its declaration of rights, but like senators in congress, nations must be pressured to agree by their people, or agree by themselves to recognize it.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
If it's not a government, then, I will tell you one last time, it has no right to intervene in Ghana and as an atheist you must accept their decision.
