let's take the example of a simple organism like a bacterium. Bacteria reproduce so quickly that we can observe many generations in a short amount of time. This allows us to see evolution in action. For instance, the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is a well-documented example of evolution. When exposed to an antibiotic, most bacteria die. However, some may have a mutation that makes them resistant. These bacteria survive and reproduce, passing on the resistance trait to their offspring. Over time, the population becomes dominated by resistant bacteria - evolution has occurred.
Sorry, but Bacteria becoming resistant to antibiotics doesn't prove that human beings are descended from electrified soup, that our ancestors are rocks, or that dogs are related to bananas. This is MICRO-evolution – which creationists FULLY AGREE WITH – but nice try. Come back again soon, I'd love to continue this discussion.
As for macroevolution - we can see clear transitions between species in fossil records, such as the evolutionary sequence leading from primitive synapsid reptiles to mammals, or the transition from fish to tetrapods.
No, we don’t. The alleged “transitional fossils” that scientists have “discovered” are fabrications. For example, to support their absurd theory that whales crawled onto fields and turned into cows, which supposedly they have “fossil evidence” for – you’ll notice all the bones that would have made it without the realm of possibility that what we’re looking at is a transitional fossil are either PLASTER FAKES inserted because the bones were never actually discovered or from DIFFERENT ANIMALS. Same I largely true for the vast majority of the “early human ancestor fossils”. Beat that, GPT.
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.