Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestions3mos ago

If you had to argue for or against life sentences, which side would you choose, and why?

9 Replies

 @9L2PJQ3 from Pennsylvania answered…2mos2MO

I would argue that life sentences should be limited to serious crimes like murder and rape

 @9L2WGFT from California disagreed…2mos2MO

I do not agree that rape is a serious crime, it does not fall into the same category as murder. Murder is a serious crime and therefore should be a life sentence. Rape is a crime as well, but I don't feel like someone should be sent to prison for life.

 @9L2VP69 from Ohio disagreed…2mos2MO

25-30 years in a cell is enough time to change a person, and make them atone, especially in a future system that is reformed to focus on rehabilitation

 @9L2P8CW from North Carolina answered…2mos2MO

I would argue on the agreement side for life sentences, only if there is justifiable evidence that that person is guilty of the crome

 @9L4BQMP from Texas agreed…2mos2MO

Time is a reasonable punishment for those who have committed crimes with large enough evidence to them guilty.

 @9L2P2RT from California answered…2mos2MO

Against, if they get life they might as well just die

 @9L2P4Z9answered…2mos2MO

life sentences because some people dont change and cant be aloud back

 @9L2P9X7 from Virginia answered…2mos2MO

mental facilities or rehabilitation facilities so that eventually, even at an old age, they could return to society. not everyone is ir-redeemable.

 @9L2PHQW from Pennsylvania answered…2mos2MO

I am for it because if you did the crime you have to pay the time.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...