Try the political quiz

23 Replies

 @FerventKingdomLibertarian from Washington commented…2mos2MO

This is how the Constitution dies.

By a tie vote, the amendment to require a warrant to spy on Americans goes down in flames.

This is a sad day for America.

The Speaker doesn’t always vote in the House, but he was the tie breaker today. He voted against warrants.

 @PassionatePaellaPatriot from South Carolina agreed…2mos2MO

congress has ZERO "authority" to simply ignore the 4th amendment by a vote. What a fraud you guys are.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Would knowing your communications could be monitored without a warrant change how you express yourself online or through messages?

 @ConservaSidPeace and Freedom from Iowa commented…2mos2MO

Vote them all out of office!

They are complicit in complete violation of the fourth amendment.

Those who didn’t vote need to go too.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…2mos2MO

Guess who opposes this illegal measure? The so-called "far-right" Republicans like Thomas Massie, Rand Paul, and Mike Lee!

 @BitternPeytonPatriot from Georgia commented…2mos2MO

if they vote for it, the FBI spies on Trump's campaign again (abuse it). if they vote against it, and a terrorist attack happens, they blame republicans for ending it.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

In what situations, if any, do you believe it's justified for the government to spy on its citizens without obtaining a warrant first?

 @HonorableThrusheSocialist from Kentucky commented…2mos2MO

It’s always safe to assume that the government will eventually find a way to reauthorize its elaborate spying powers in the name of “keeping us safe.” Never fails

 @Grassr00tEllaLibertarian from Minnesota agreed…2mos2MO

If a dictator ever comes to power in the US, it will be in the name of "keeping us safe".

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

If a law makes it easier for authorities to prevent crimes but also infringes on personal privacy, do you think it's worth it?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Do you think the government should prioritize national security over personal privacy, and where should the line be drawn?

 @E1ectoralBillRepublican from Massachusetts commented…2mos2MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would you feel if someone had the power to watch over your personal communications without your knowledge or consent?

 @FilibusterKittenGreen from North Dakota commented…2mos2MO

This is how we turn from a "free country" into a Police State.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…2mos2MO

By ignoring our constitution. This started with John Marshall's Federalist judges and was accelerated by Lincoln's invasion of the South in 1861.

 @OppositionChowder from Utah commented…2mos2MO

I have not seen the US Security State or war machine not get what it wants in Washington.

In the face of mass abuse of surveillance power, they just got renewed warrantless spying power on Americans.

They now have Mike Johnson working to get them the $60b to send to Ukraine.

 @DearC0nstituti0nal from Kentucky commented…2mos2MO

I have not seen the US Security State or war machine not get what it wants in Washington.

In the face of mass abuse of surveillance power, they just got renewed warrantless spying power on Americans.

They now have Mike Johnson working to get them the $60b to send to Ukraine.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…2mos2MO

Just gives you a warm, fuzzy feeling for mankind that these "public servants" want to spy on us illegally.

 @D3baterBuckForward from Michigan commented…2mos2MO

I love how they think the 4th amendment is a threat to national security.

 @BobcatDannySocialist from Utah commented…2mos2MO

I have not seen the US Security State or war machine not get what it wants in Washington.

In the face of mass abuse of surveillance power, they just got renewed warrantless spying power on Americans.

They now have Mike Johnson working to get them the $60b to send to Ukraine.

 @NourishingApplesDemocratfrom Minnesota commented…2mos2MO

Among the Dems voting NO on the warrant requirement, giving the US Security State what it wants:

Schiff, Pelosi, Clyburn, Wasserman-Schultz, Lieu, Dan Goldman, Raskin, Thompson (Jan 6 crew).

Among GOP voting NO:

Crenshaw, Lawler, Stefanik, McCaul, Turner, Gallagher.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...