Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MJY4P4 from Florida answered…15mins15m

Increase legal campsites and lengths allowing for affordable transitional options. Increase funding to housing and tiny…

 @9MJW2FD from Georgia answered…2hrs2H

No. The government should focus on building mental health institutions for the homeless and ban corporations like Blackr…

 @9MJVKCV from New Jersey answered…2hrs2H

I do feel like they need at least somewhere to stay, until they find a way to financially suopport them selves, but the…

 @9MJSR47 from Florida answered…3hrs3H

No, but we should improve current social programs and expand shelters for homeless individuals (teaching skills for the…

 @9MJJ4YG from Utah answered…12hrs12H

No, unless services, housing, shelters, etc are not inhabitable or an improvement from conditions living on the streets…

 @9MJGVHV from California answered…14hrs14H

Yes, but individuals should not be able to keep sustained encampments nor should the government heavily criminalize the…

 @9MJFRL2 from California answered…15hrs15H

There needs to be a change, weather that be with more shelters or aid facilities, there is too much at stake for us and…

 @9MJCZTR from Hawaii answered…18hrs18H

yes, but it is still public property so they have to conduct themselves in that way, they can be removed if they are cau…

 @9MJ9YDD from Oregon answered…20hrs20H

for their own safety from the public, and from businesses that would inevitably behave cruely to deter them from camping…

 @9MJ9M5L from Utah answered…20hrs20H

there should be specific places for them to go that aren't necessarily a program or shelter just a protected grassy are…

 @9MJ8Z6G from California answered…20hrs20H

well technically they have no where to be so even if its a crime to sleep or camp on public property it wouldn't matter…

 @9MJ8PMR from Louisiana answered…21hrs21H

I dont think high density would be beneficial those who suffer from houslessness struggle when transitioning back to hom…

 @9MJ7R8G from Pennsylvania answered…21hrs21H

Yes, but these new buildings should be centered around walkability, public transit, and should be built to be human-scal…

 @9MJ7R8G from Pennsylvania answered…21hrs21H

The minority of homeless people who refuse shelter typically have some bad experience with it. I think it's better to al…

 @9MJ7JMS from Virginia answered…21hrs21H

Yes, high density AFFORDABLE residential buildings which do not cause property taxes to skyrocket and push out long-stan…

 @9MJ75GK from California answered…22hrs22H

if they aren't damaging the property and making a mess then yes, not they are disrupting the area then no

 @9MJ6R9B from Indiana answered…22hrs22H

Assign public hours (i.e. 8:30 AM to 9:30 PM) where they can’t sleep there. Sleeping past it will be met with a reminder…

 @9MJ5LF8 from Illinois answered…23hrs23H

it isnt that they should be allowed to stay there but instead unvilified in order to better help them get on their own f…

 @9MJ5585 from California answered…23hrs23H

Yes, in certain areas as long as they keep it clean and don't do drugs or stab each other. There should be campsites or…

 @9MJ54VF from California answered…23hrs23H

Homeless should be able to sleep someone on public property if they refuse the option to sleep in shelters or housing. L…

 @9MJ544M from Nevada answered…23hrs23H

Depending on the reasoning behind their homelessness and refusal, they should be able to sleep on certain public propert…

 @9MJ4GC2 from Florida answered…23hrs23H

In municipal areas where high housing density is required and in areas that will not suffer environmental degradation on…

 @9MJ46NK from Connecticut answered…24hrs24H

Yes because means more people but no cause it will also make property for everybody more expensive I think.