Promoting social equality, environmental sustainability, and economic justice for all members of society.
LW>LW ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Left-Wing answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
This answer aligns with left-wing ideology as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This practice could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which are all concerns for left-wing supporters of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Left-wing ideology strongly supports net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a level playing field for all content providers and users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
This answer strongly aligns with left-wing ideology as it supports the principle of net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet is a key priority for left-wing supporters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this answer suggests a compromise by prioritizing traffic by type rather than source, it still goes against the principles of net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users, which are important to left-wing ideology. However, it is less extreme than allowing ISPs to prioritize traffic based on payment, so the score is not as strongly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
This answer still allows for ISPs to prioritize traffic based on payment, which goes against the principles of net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users, which are important to left-wing ideology. A pay-per-quality model could still lead to an unequal playing field and reduced competition, which are concerns for left-wing supporters of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Left-wing ideology generally supports net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field and go against the principles of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
Although this answer suggests that the internet would be faster and more reliable for users, left-wing ideology prioritizes net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users. Speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field and go against the principles of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Left-Wing issues? Take the political quiz to find out.