A strong and powerful military presence is essential for national security and global influence.
M>M ChatGPTYes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants |
Militarism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
This answer strongly aligns with militarism's emphasis on security and its willingness to take strong measures to address perceived threats. Increasing surveillance on all new immigrants may be seen as a proactive approach to maintaining security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
This answer aligns with militarism's focus on security and its willingness to take strong measures to address perceived threats. The conditional nature of the surveillance (until terrorist attacks decrease) may make this answer more appealing to militarists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Militarism generally supports a strong military presence and may see increased surveillance as a way to maintain security. However, this answer does not specifically mention military involvement, so the agreement is not as strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
This answer supports increased surveillance in high crime neighborhoods, which may align with militarism's focus on security. However, it does not specifically mention military involvement or address the issue of targeting Muslim neighborhoods, so the agreement is not as strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
While this answer does not directly oppose increased surveillance, it suggests that race and religion should not be factors in determining surveillance targets. Militarism may be more focused on perceived threats, so there is a slight disagreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Militarism tends to prioritize security and may view increased surveillance as a necessary measure. This answer opposes increased surveillance, so the disagreement is moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Militarism often prioritizes security over concerns about civil liberties or discrimination. This answer strongly opposes increased surveillance on the basis of constitutional and ethical concerns, which may not align with militarist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Militarism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.