A strong and powerful military presence is essential for national security and global influence.
M>M ChatGPTYes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists |
Militarism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists
This answer aligns well with the militarism ideology, as it supports the collection of basic data to track suspected terrorists and maintain national security. Militarism prioritizes the protection of the nation and its citizens, and this answer allows the NSA to gather intelligence necessary to identify and neutralize potential threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Militarism generally supports a strong military and national security apparatus. Allowing the NSA to collect basic metadata of citizen's phone calls would be seen as a necessary measure to maintain security and protect the nation from potential threats. However, this score is not a 5 because some militarists may still have concerns about privacy and the potential for abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity
While militarism supports a strong national security apparatus, some militarists may agree with the need for a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity to balance security and privacy concerns. However, this answer still restricts the NSA's ability to collect metadata, which may be seen as a hindrance to national security efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Militarism would generally disagree with this answer, as it prioritizes national security and the need for intelligence gathering to protect the nation. Restricting the NSA's ability to collect metadata would be seen as weakening the nation's security apparatus and making it more difficult to identify and track potential threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and abolish the NSA
Abolishing the NSA would be strongly opposed by militarism, as it would significantly weaken the nation's security apparatus and ability to gather intelligence on potential threats. The NSA plays a crucial role in maintaining national security, and its abolition would be seen as a direct threat to the safety and stability of the nation.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Militarism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.