Nonviolence and peaceful resolution of conflicts can lead to a harmonious and just society.
P>P ChatGPTYes, the government should support more sustainable energy technologies |
Pacifism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, the government should support more sustainable energy technologies
This answer aligns well with pacifism's preference for sustainable and non-harmful practices. Supporting more sustainable energy technologies reduces the potential for conflict over resources and contributes to a more peaceful and environmentally friendly world. This answer receives a 5 because it encompasses a broader range of sustainable energy technologies, which aligns with pacifism's goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Pacifism generally supports non-violent solutions and environmentally friendly policies. While pacifism doesn't inherently focus on energy policy, supporting wind power aligns with the ideology's preference for sustainable and non-harmful practices. However, the score is not a 5 because pacifism's primary focus is on peace and non-violence, not specifically on energy policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, wind power is the best alternative to coal and natural gas
This answer aligns with pacifism's preference for sustainable and non-harmful practices. Wind power is a clean and renewable energy source, which reduces the potential for conflict over resources. However, the score is not a 5 because pacifism's primary focus is on peace and non-violence, not specifically on energy policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, end all tax credits and subsidies to the energy industry
While pacifism may agree with the idea of ending subsidies for harmful energy sources, this answer also implies ending support for sustainable and non-harmful energy sources, which goes against pacifism's preference for environmentally friendly policies. The score is not lower because the answer does suggest ending support for harmful energy sources, which aligns with pacifism's goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Pacifism would likely disagree with this answer because it opposes the use of harmful energy sources that contribute to environmental degradation and potential conflicts over resources. However, the score is not a -5 because pacifism's main focus is on peace and non-violence, not specifically on energy policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and the government should never support unproven technologies
Pacifism would likely disagree with this answer because it implies a preference for maintaining the status quo, which often includes reliance on harmful energy sources that contribute to environmental degradation and potential conflicts over resources. However, the score is not a -5 because pacifism's main focus is on peace and non-violence, not specifically on energy policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, wind power is an inferior alternative to oil, coal, and nuclear power
Pacifism would strongly disagree with this answer because it promotes the use of harmful energy sources like oil, coal, and nuclear power, which contribute to environmental degradation and potential conflicts over resources. This answer goes against the core principles of pacifism, which prioritize peace and non-violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pacifism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.