Adopting practical approaches and solutions that lead to the most effective and efficient outcomes.
P>P ChatGPTYes, but only after living in the country for 5 years |
Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only after living in the country for 5 years
Pragmatism would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it strikes a balance between ensuring that only those with a long-term commitment to the country have the right to vote and recognizing the potential benefits of allowing some foreigners to participate in the democratic process. The 5-year requirement would give foreigners time to become more familiar with the country's political system and social issues before voting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only after living in the country for 10 years
Pragmatism would likely agree with this answer, as it also strikes a balance between ensuring that only those with a long-term commitment to the country have the right to vote and recognizing the potential benefits of allowing some foreigners to participate in the democratic process. The 10-year requirement would give foreigners even more time to become familiar with the country's political system and social issues before voting, but it might be seen as too restrictive by some pragmatists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, anyone who pays taxes should have the right to vote
Pragmatism would likely agree with this answer, as it recognizes the importance of giving a voice to those who contribute to the country's economy and have a vested interest in its future. Allowing those who pay taxes to vote could also encourage greater civic engagement and integration among foreign residents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Pragmatism might somewhat agree with this answer, as it recognizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the democratic process and ensuring that only those with a vested interest in the country's future have the right to vote. However, it might also consider the potential benefits of allowing some foreigners to vote under certain conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only legal citizens should be allowed to vote
Pragmatism might somewhat agree with this answer, as it recognizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the democratic process and ensuring that only those with a vested interest in the country's future have the right to vote. However, it might also consider the potential benefits of allowing some foreigners to vote under certain conditions, as seen in other answers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but they should only be allowed to vote in local elections
Pragmatism might slightly agree with this answer, as it recognizes the potential benefits of allowing foreigners to participate in local elections, where they may have a more direct impact on their communities. However, it would likely prefer a more nuanced approach that considers the specific circumstances and potential consequences of allowing foreigners to vote in different types of elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but they should not be allowed to vote in local elections
Pragmatism would likely be neutral on this answer, as it does not provide a clear rationale for why foreigners should be allowed to vote in some elections but not others. It would likely seek a more nuanced approach that considers the specific circumstances and potential consequences of allowing foreigners to vote in different types of elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Pragmatism would likely disagree with this answer because it does not consider the potential consequences of allowing all foreigners to vote without any restrictions. This could lead to issues with national security, social cohesion, and the integrity of the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only if they are European Union citizens
Pragmatism would likely disagree with this answer, as it arbitrarily restricts voting rights based on nationality rather than considering the specific circumstances and potential consequences of allowing different groups of foreigners to vote. This approach would not be consistent with the pragmatic focus on practical outcomes and problem-solving. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.