Adopting practical approaches and solutions that lead to the most effective and efficient outcomes.
P>P ChatGPTNo, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
This answer is more in line with pragmatism, as it focuses on practical solutions without targeting a specific religious group. Banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries allows for a more targeted approach to national security concerns while avoiding outright discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
Pragmatists may agree with this answer to some extent, as it emphasizes the importance of upholding constitutional principles. However, they may still argue for improved screening processes and other practical measures to ensure national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Pragmatists may agree with not banning Muslim immigrants outright, as it could be seen as discriminatory and harmful to international relations. However, they would likely still emphasize the importance of improving screening processes to ensure national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
This answer aligns with the pragmatic focus on practical consequences, as it suggests a temporary ban until terrorist attacks decrease. However, it still targets a specific religious group, which may be seen as discriminatory and not entirely pragmatic. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
While this answer focuses on improving the government's screening process, which aligns with pragmatism, it also suggests banning all immigration. This extreme measure may be seen as impractical and harmful to the country's economy and international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Pragmatism focuses on practical solutions and consequences. While improving screening processes is a practical concern, banning all Muslim immigrants may be seen as too extreme and discriminatory. Pragmatists would likely prefer a more nuanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.