The Bible was explicitly stated to not be the basis of law, nor is it acknowledged as a basis for it in most any society, and when it has, people fail miserably to avoid a warped version of Christianity, so no, it can’t be the basis for this law. It doesn’t necessarily deal with those circumstances, and by that logic, we shouldn’t allow single-parent households at all, which is also extremely difficult and dangerous f an idea. The nuclear family is not directly harmed, people cheat for free all the time, this just decriminalizes doing it for money. The same logic in my last sentence applied for “otherwise virtuous men”. The government doesn’t have a strong reason to discourage it, and if that’s the case, then why don’t they just make it cost money to be allowed to do that instead? They could gain more from it.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution4mos4MO
I literally just explained to you WHY the government has a strong reason to discourage it, but you just respond with this word salad nonsense about not thinking the Bible is the basis of law. Why shouldn't it be? Wouldn't God's laws be higher than government's laws? And since you have demonstrated an obvious inability to make a logical argument against God, why are you assuming, again, that He doesn't exist?
@9CJ6CB64mos4MO
The nuclear family is not going to be damaged much by allowing something that already happens to continue with the addon of money being involved. Someone can screw with someone else if they’re willing to pay for it, I don’t freaking care, that’s not hurting people directly, that’s something that already happens anyway without criminalization in most places, and the nuclear family is fine. I literally don’t even care about that thing, and I’m fine with others doing it as they wish, though I find it shameful to do in a marriage, that will happen with or witho… Read more
@Patriot-#1776Constitution4mos4MO
Why is the Bible not a great basis for laws? As I demonstrated, it is the ONLY LOGICAL POSSIBILITY – and as you demonstrated, the atheist has ZERO rational rebuttals to the logical proof presented. As it is the only logical possibility, meaning that it must be the inerrant word of God, it is the best basis for laws that human beings have at their disposal. If you would like to argue otherwise, you're going to have to first justify your capacity for reasoning, morality, and the reliability of your senses, explain what your ultimate standard is, and show me how it can justify everything that is knowable. I've done this, now your turn.
@9CJ6CB64mos4MO
I don’t have to explain to you why we exist or why senses exist to explain why it’s illogical to think that just because you have an explanation you’re not necessarily right. I don’t have to explain anything to you to have a non-belief, that argument falls to the hands of someone who is trying to empirically prove something, and a proof trying to prove itself is considered fallacious and false. The Bible is not made to be a basis of governance, it’s a book meant to teach individuals in religious movements how they should be, but at no point did the United States… Read more
@Patriot-#1776Constitution4mos4MO
I don’t have to explain to you why we exist or why senses exist to explain why it’s illogical to think that just because you have an explanation you’re not necessarily right. I don’t have to explain anything to you to have a non-belief, that argument falls to the hands of someone who is trying to empirically prove something, and a proof trying to prove itself is considered fallacious and false.
Did you sleep through my entire comment proving Christianity, or just weren't responsible enough to read it? Remember that all human beings must have an Ultimate Standard… Read more
