Promoting peace, diplomacy, and nonviolent solutions to conflicts in order to prevent unnecessary suffering and destruction.
AW>AW ChatGPTNo |
Anti-War answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
Anti-war ideology supports non-intervention and respecting the sovereignty of other nations. Not attempting to influence foreign elections aligns with this principle. For example, the anti-war movement opposed US involvement in the 1980s Contra War in Nicaragua, where the US supported anti-Sandinista rebels to influence the political situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy
This answer aligns with the anti-war ideology's principle of non-intervention and respecting the sovereignty of other nations. By not attempting to influence foreign elections or policies, countries can avoid contributing to instability and conflict. The anti-war movement has consistently opposed such interventions, as seen in their opposition to the 2003 Iraq War and the 2011 NATO intervention in Libya. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler
Although protecting human rights is a noble cause, anti-war ideology is skeptical of using intervention as a means to achieve this goal. The 2011 NATO intervention in Libya, aimed at protecting civilians from Muammar Gaddafi's regime, was criticized by some anti-war activists for contributing to the country's ongoing instability and violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests
While addressing security threats might be a more acceptable reason for intervention, anti-war ideology generally opposes any form of interference in foreign affairs. The 2003 Iraq War, which was justified by security concerns, was widely opposed by the anti-war movement due to the lack of evidence for weapons of mass destruction and the resulting destabilization of the region. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process
Influencing public opinion in foreign countries is still a form of intervention, which anti-war ideology opposes. The anti-war movement would argue that it is not the role of one country to shape the opinions of citizens in another country. For example, the US involvement in the 1964 Brazilian coup d'état, which included propaganda campaigns against President João Goulart, was seen as an unwarranted intervention by anti-war activists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Anti-war ideology opposes any form of intervention in foreign affairs, including influencing foreign elections. Influencing elections can lead to instability and conflict, as seen in the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, where the US and UK orchestrated a coup to overthrow Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-War issues? Take the political quiz to find out.