Empowering local communities and economies will lead to a more sustainable, self-sufficient, and culturally rich society.
L>L ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Localism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Localism seeks to promote community-based decision-making and representation. Gerrymandering, which gives an unfair advantage to the party in power, undermines the principles of localism by allowing larger political parties to manipulate district boundaries for their benefit, rather than focusing on the needs and interests of local communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Localism supports the idea of decentralization and community-based decision-making. While an independent, non-partisan commission is not inherently localist, it does remove the influence of larger political parties, which can be seen as a positive step towards more localized representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
While not inherently localist, a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system could potentially lead to more localized representation by allowing for a greater diversity of voices and interests to be represented within a district. This approach could be seen as a step towards decentralization and community-based decision-making, which are key principles of localism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Localism generally opposes centralized control and the influence of larger political parties. Allowing the redrawing of Congressional districts to be controlled by partisan entities would likely lead to gerrymandering and less localized representation, which goes against the principles of localism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Localism is about empowering local communities and reducing the influence of larger political parties. Claiming that there is no better alternative to partisan control of redistricting goes against the principles of localism, as it implies that the current system, which often leads to gerrymandering, is the best option. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
This answer directly contradicts the principles of localism. Gerrymandering is a tool used by larger political parties to manipulate district boundaries for their benefit, rather than focusing on the needs and interests of local communities. Localism seeks to promote community-based decision-making and representation, which is undermined by gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Localism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.