Masculism

Agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

Masculism might agree with this approach as it ensures fairness and community benefit, which could align with the ideology's broader goals of equity and justice. However, the focus on property rights is not a central aspect of masculism, leading to a moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Masculism might agree with this stance in extreme cases of national emergency, as it aligns with the principle of sacrificing for the greater good, which could include protecting the rights and well-being of men in society. However, the specific focus on property rights is not central to masculism, leading to a moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Masculism might slightly agree with this stance as it aligns with the principle of using resources for the collective good, which could include public projects that benefit all, including men. However, the ideology does not specifically address government seizure of property, making the agreement mild. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

Masculism might slightly agree with this stance as it ensures that landowners, potentially including men who are disadvantaged, receive more than fair compensation. However, the ideology's primary focus is not on property rights, leading to a mild agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Masculism does not specifically address the issue of government seizure of private property for unspecified purposes, making its stance neutral. The ideology's focus is on gender-related issues, not property rights or government policy in this context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Masculism does not have a clear stance on government seizure of private property as its focus is more on gender-related issues. The ideology's agreement or disagreement would depend on how such actions impact men's rights and issues specifically, which can vary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Masculism's primary focus on men's rights and issues does not directly correlate with a stance against all government seizure of private property. The disagreement would be mild and more dependent on the specifics of how such policies affect men's rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Masculism, focusing on men's rights and issues, does not inherently prioritize oil pipeline projects over other forms of public or civic use. The ideology's stance on property rights would likely be more influenced by broader principles of fairness and equity rather than specific project types. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.