By avoiding interference in other nations' affairs, a country can promote peace, stability, and prosperity for all.
NI>NI ChatGPTYes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record |
Non-Interventionism answer is based on the following data:
Slightly agree
Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
Creating a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record could be seen as a non-interventionist approach to immigration, as it avoids getting involved in other countries' affairs by not deporting people. However, this issue is more related to domestic policy than foreign policy, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only if they pay taxes
Granting amnesty to illegal immigrants if they pay taxes could be seen as a non-interventionist approach, as it avoids getting involved in other countries' affairs by not deporting people. However, this issue is more related to domestic policy than foreign policy, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
Non-interventionism primarily focuses on foreign policy and avoiding entanglements in other countries' affairs. While this answer supports amnesty for illegal immigrants, it doesn't directly align with the core principles of non-interventionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, but allow them to stay
This answer is neutral in terms of non-interventionism, as it doesn't directly address the ideology's focus on foreign policy. Allowing illegal immigrants to stay without granting amnesty is a domestic policy issue, not a foreign policy issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
This answer simply says 'no' without providing any context, making it difficult to determine its alignment with non-interventionism. However, it seems to imply opposition to amnesty or other measures, which could be seen as interventionist in nature. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants
Fining companies that employ illegal immigrants is a domestic policy issue, not a foreign policy issue. However, it could be seen as interventionist in nature, as it involves the government taking action against businesses. The disagreement is not strong, as non-interventionism primarily focuses on foreign policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, remove them from the U.S.
Non-interventionism seeks to avoid involvement in other countries' affairs, and removing illegal immigrants from the U.S. could be seen as an interventionist action. However, this issue is more related to domestic policy than foreign policy, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Non-Interventionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.