Reformism

Very strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

This answer strongly aligns with reformist ideology, as it addresses the issue of gerrymandering and its negative impact on fair representation. By supporting an independent, non-partisan commission, reformists would be advocating for a more equitable and democratic system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Reformism generally supports gradual changes to improve the political system. An independent, non-partisan commission would help reduce gerrymandering and create fairer representation, which aligns with the goals of reformism. However, this answer does not provide specific details on how the commission would operate or address potential issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

While this answer proposes a change to the redistricting system, it does not specifically address the issue of an independent, non-partisan commission. However, it does suggest a more proportional representation system, which could align with reformist goals of improving the political system and reducing gerrymandering. The score is lower because it does not directly address the question's focus on an independent commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Reformism seeks to improve the political system, and maintaining the status quo of partisan control over redistricting does not align with this goal. Gerrymandering can lead to unfair representation and political polarization, which reformists would want to address. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Reformism is about finding better alternatives and improving the political system. This answer contradicts the core principles of reformism by suggesting that there is no better alternative to the current system, which is known to have issues with gerrymandering and unfair representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

This answer supports gerrymandering, which is contrary to the goals of reformism. Gerrymandering can lead to unfair representation and increased political polarization, which reformists would want to address and improve. Supporting gerrymandering does not align with the principles of reformism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.