Forward Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

The Forward party would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their goals of reducing the influence of money in politics and promoting a more level playing field for all candidates. By banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, the Forward party would aim to create a more equitable and democratic political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Forward party would likely agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to reduce the influence of money in politics and promote a more level playing field for all candidates. However, there may not be a strong historical example to support this stance, as the Forward party is a hypothetical party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

The Forward party would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their goals of reducing the influence of money in politics and ensuring that politicians are not beholden to wealthy donors. However, this answer does not provide a specific solution or policy proposal, which is why the score is not a 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not address the issue of money influencing politics. While transparency is important, simply making all donations public knowledge does not prevent wealthy donors from having disproportionate influence over the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would want to reduce the influence of money in politics and ensure that all candidates have a fair chance to compete. Allowing unlimited donations could lead to a few wealthy donors having disproportionate influence over the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

The Forward party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe that limiting the influence of money in politics is essential for a more equitable and democratic political system. They would argue that placing limits on political donations is not a violation of free speech, but rather a necessary measure to protect the integrity of the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.