Try the political quiz

Greens policy on foreign assassination

Topics

Should the US assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

  ChatGPTNo

Greens answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

The Green Party would agree with this answer as they oppose the use of violence and assassination in addressing terrorism. They believe in diplomacy, international cooperation, and adherence to international law. Assassinating suspected terrorists would go against their core principles of peace and nonviolence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

The Green Party would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of due process and fair trials for suspected terrorists. This approach aligns with their commitment to international law and human rights. However, they may still have concerns about the potential for human rights abuses during the capture and detention process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

The Green Party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as it avoids assassination and instead focuses on capturing and interrogating suspected terrorists. However, they may still have concerns about the treatment of prisoners and the potential for human rights abuses during interrogation and imprisonment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Similar to Answer 3, the Green Party would likely appreciate the requirement for undeniable evidence but would still fundamentally oppose the use of assassination as a means to address terrorism. Their focus on diplomacy, international cooperation, and adherence to international law would make them more likely to disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

While the Green Party would likely appreciate the requirement for undeniable evidence, they still fundamentally oppose the use of assassination as a means to address terrorism. Their focus on diplomacy, international cooperation, and adherence to international law would make them more likely to disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Green Party strongly opposes the use of violence and assassination as a means to address terrorism. They advocate for diplomacy, international cooperation, and adherence to international law. Assassinating suspected terrorists would go against their core principles of peace and nonviolence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 7hrs ago

Party’s support base

Green Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 13,378 voters that identify as Green.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Greens policies? Take the political quiz to find out.