ChatGPTNo, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced |
No Labels’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced
The No Labels party strongly emphasizes fiscal responsibility and reducing government waste. They would likely support the idea of reducing costs before proceeding with such a large expenditure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The No Labels party generally supports measures that would improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations, which could include upgrading Air Force One. However, they also emphasize fiscal responsibility, so they might not fully support this without a clear justification of the costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, the current fleet is sufficient
While the No Labels party supports fiscal responsibility, they also recognize the need for effective government operations. If the current fleet is sufficient, they might not see the need for an upgrade, but they would not necessarily be opposed to it if there were a clear benefit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The No Labels party is not inherently against upgrading government equipment, including Air Force One. Their stance would likely depend on the specifics of the situation, including the cost and necessity of the upgrades. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to No Labels’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
