No Labels Party

Strongly agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

This answer likely aligns well with the No Labels party's values. They would likely agree with the need for transparency and accountability in income-related transactions, while also respecting the privacy of non-income related transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

This answer aligns more closely with the No Labels party's values. They would likely agree with the need for transparency and accountability, but also believe that the threshold should be higher to protect individual privacy and prevent unnecessary intrusion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, except for low income citizens

No Labels might agree with this answer to some extent, as they often advocate for policies that protect low-income citizens. However, they might also see this as a form of discrimination and prefer a more uniform policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

While No Labels might not be completely against reporting transactions to the IRS, they would likely have concerns about privacy and the potential for misuse of information. Therefore, they might lean towards disagreement with this statement, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, private transactions should be kept private

No Labels might have mixed feelings about this answer. While they value privacy, they also understand the need for transparency and accountability in financial transactions. Therefore, they might neither strongly agree nor disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The No Labels party generally supports policies that promote transparency and accountability, but they also value privacy and individual rights. They might see a $600 threshold as too low and potentially invasive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.