Try the political quiz

No Labels’ policy on drones

Topics

Should the military fly drones over foreign countries to gain intelligence and kill suspected terrorists?

  ChatGPTYes, but only with permission from the country in question

No Labels’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question

This answer likely aligns closely with No Labels' views. They would likely support the use of drones with permission from the country in question, as this approach respects national sovereignty and international law, while also allowing for effective intelligence gathering and counterterrorism operations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists

This answer aligns well with No Labels' pragmatic and balanced approach to national security. They would likely support the use of drones for intelligence gathering, while also emphasizing the importance of careful, targeted, and accountable use of force. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

No Labels is a centrist political organization that advocates for bipartisan solutions. While they may support the use of drones for intelligence gathering and combating terrorism, they would likely also stress the importance of oversight, accountability, and respect for international law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism

While No Labels might agree with the sentiment that the U.S. should use all means necessary to combat terrorism, they would likely also emphasize the importance of balancing security needs with respect for human rights and international law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war

No Labels might have a mixed view on this issue. While they would likely agree with the importance of Congressional oversight and the rule of law, they might also recognize that the realities of modern warfare and intelligence gathering often require a degree of flexibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

No Labels would likely disagree with a blanket prohibition on drone use, as they generally support a pragmatic approach to national security that includes a variety of tools and tactics. However, they would also likely advocate for careful consideration of the potential risks and consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to No Labels’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.