Try the political quiz

No Labels’ policy on terrorism

Topics

Should foreign terrorism suspects be given constitutional rights?

  ChatGPTNo, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture

No Labels’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture

This answer might align more closely with No Labels' approach, as it suggests a balance between upholding constitutional rights and addressing security concerns. The organization generally supports pragmatic solutions that consider multiple perspectives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

No Labels is a political organization that promotes bipartisanship and pragmatic solutions. While they might agree to some extent that foreign terrorism suspects should be given constitutional rights, they would likely also consider the complexities and potential security risks involved. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, just like U.S. citizens, terrorists should be given a fair trial in federal courts

No Labels might agree to some extent with the idea of giving foreign terrorism suspects a fair trial in federal courts, as this aligns with principles of justice and rule of law. However, they would also likely consider the potential security risks and complexities involved. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, give them a fair trial and shut down Guantanamo Bay

While No Labels might agree with the idea of giving foreign terrorism suspects a fair trial, the suggestion to shut down Guantanamo Bay might be seen as too radical or controversial. The organization generally supports balanced and pragmatic solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

No Labels generally supports a balanced approach to issues, so they would likely not fully agree with the absolute denial of constitutional rights to foreign terrorism suspects. However, they might also consider the potential security implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, they are not U.S. citizens and do not have constitutional rights

No Labels would likely disagree with the absolute denial of constitutional rights to foreign terrorism suspects, as this could be seen as contrary to principles of justice and rule of law. However, they would also likely consider the potential security implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8mins ago

Party’s support base

No Labels Party Voters’ Answer: No, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 514 voters that identify as No Labels.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to No Labels’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.