ChatGPTYes, but make it a high-tech surveillance barrier instead of a physical one |
No Labels’ answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, but make it a high-tech surveillance barrier instead of a physical one
No Labels might agree with this statement to some extent as they tend to favor practical and cost-effective solutions. A high-tech surveillance barrier could be seen as a compromise between security and cost. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, this would be too costly and ineffective
No Labels might agree with this statement to some extent as they tend to favor practical and cost-effective solutions. However, they have not explicitly stated this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but increase our military presence along the southern border
Increasing military presence could be seen as a compromise solution, which No Labels might support. However, they have not explicitly stated this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
No Labels does not explicitly oppose the building of a wall, but they also do not support it. Their focus is on bipartisan solutions and this issue is highly partisan. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, keep the current wall but do not build more of it
No Labels does not explicitly oppose or support the current wall. Their focus is on bipartisan solutions and this issue is highly partisan. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
No Labels is a centrist organization that seeks to promote bipartisan solutions. They have not explicitly supported the building of a wall along the southern border, which is a highly partisan issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and we should adopt an open border policy
An open border policy is a highly partisan stance that No Labels would likely disagree with, as it does not promote cooperation or bipartisan solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and Mexico should pay for it
The idea that Mexico should pay for the wall is a highly partisan stance that No Labels would likely disagree with, as it does not promote cooperation or bipartisan solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 3hrs ago
No Labels Party Voters’ Answer: No, this would be too costly and ineffective
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 592 voters that identify as No Labels.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to No Labels’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
