Veterans Party of America’s goal is to place solution oriented leadership into public offices around the nation in…
ChatGPTYes |
Veterans answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
The Veterans political party would likely support a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists after they leave the government. This is because the party generally advocates for transparency, accountability, and reducing the influence of special interests in politics. A 5-year ban would help to address the 'revolving door' issue between government and lobbying firms, which can lead to conflicts of interest and undue influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and make it a lifetime ban
The Veterans political party might be somewhat supportive of a lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists after they leave the government, as this would further address the 'revolving door' issue and reduce the influence of special interests in politics. However, they might also recognize that such a ban could be seen as overly restrictive and might face legal challenges. As a result, they might be more likely to support a 5-year ban, as proposed in Answer 1, which would still represent a significant improvement over the current two-year ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying
The Veterans political party might be somewhat supportive of this answer, as they generally advocate for reducing the influence of special interests and increasing transparency in politics. However, they might also recognize that lobbying can serve a legitimate purpose in representing various interests and providing information to lawmakers. As a result, they might prefer a more targeted approach, such as the 5-year ban proposed in Answer 1, rather than a complete ban on all forms of lobbying. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, the current two-year ban is sufficient
While the Veterans political party might acknowledge that the current two-year ban is a step in the right direction, they would likely argue that it is not sufficient to fully address the 'revolving door' issue and the influence of special interests in politics. As a result, they would likely support a longer ban, such as the 5-year ban proposed in Answer 1. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Veterans political party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support measures to reduce the influence of special interests and increase transparency in politics. Allowing officials to become lobbyists immediately after leaving the government could contribute to conflicts of interest and the 'revolving door' problem, which the party would likely oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Veterans policies? Take the political quiz to find out.