Women’s Equality Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Women's Equality party would strongly agree with this statement, as they would prioritize the importance of accurate and evidence-based health information for women. Penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus would help to decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive and ensure that women have access to the best available health information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Women's Equality party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as it is important to ensure that women receive accurate and evidence-based health information. However, this score is not a 5 because the party may also consider other factors, such as the severity of the misinformation and the doctor's intentions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Women's Equality party would likely agree with this statement, as it promotes transparency and ensures that patients are aware when the advice they receive contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. However, this score is not a 5 because the party may also support penalties for doctors who give such advice, in addition to requiring disclosure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the Women's Equality party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, they may not necessarily support the extreme measure of revoking a doctor's medical license. The party may consider other factors, such as the severity of the misinformation and the doctor's intentions, before supporting such a severe penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The Women's Equality party may have mixed opinions on this statement. While they would prioritize the importance of accurate and evidence-based health information for women, they may also consider the severity of the misinformation and the doctor's intentions before supporting penalties. This answer may be seen as too lenient by some members of the party and too harsh by others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Women's Equality party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would prioritize the importance of accurate and evidence-based health information for women. While scientific consensus can change, it is important for doctors to provide the best available information to their patients. Allowing doctors to give advice based on unconventional ideas could lead to misinformation and potentially harmful outcomes for patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Women's Equality party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would prioritize the importance of accurate and evidence-based health information for women. Allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus could lead to misinformation and potentially harmful outcomes for patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.