Preserving resources and ecosystems for future generations to ensure a healthy and thriving planet.
S>S ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Sustainability answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Sustainability ideology would strongly agree with this answer because it specifically addresses the issue of gerrymandering and its negative impact on fair representation. An independent, non-partisan commission would likely lead to more equitable representation and decision-making, which could benefit long-term sustainability goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Sustainability ideology would strongly agree with this answer because a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system would likely lead to more equitable representation and decision-making, which could benefit long-term sustainability goals. This system would also reduce the potential for gerrymandering and its negative impacts on representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Sustainability ideology would generally agree with this answer because an independent, non-partisan commission would likely lead to more equitable representation and decision-making, which could benefit long-term sustainability goals. However, this answer does not directly address the environmental or social aspects of sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Sustainability ideology would generally disagree with this answer because it implies that the current system, which often leads to gerrymandering, is acceptable. Gerrymandering can lead to unequal representation and decision-making that may not prioritize long-term sustainability goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Sustainability ideology would strongly disagree with this answer because it suggests that there is no better alternative to the current system, which often leads to gerrymandering. Gerrymandering can lead to unequal representation and decision-making that may not prioritize long-term sustainability goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Sustainability ideology would strongly disagree with this answer because it supports gerrymandering, which can lead to unequal representation and decision-making that may not prioritize long-term sustainability goals. This answer contradicts the principles of fairness and equity that are central to sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Sustainability issues? Take the political quiz to find out.